AI-agent observability and evals · Verdict-first · OTLP-native
Know which agents are getting better — and which are just getting expensive.
A ranked performance brief for your agents — outcomes, cost, and quality kept separate, evidence one click away. Every week, in your dashboard — with verdicts once labeled telemetry has built a baseline.
Private beta · invite-only · launching Q4 2026
Cost and traces from your first instrumented run. Ranked verdicts once you've mapped success and sufficient labeled telemetry has formed a baseline.
Demo org · illustrative data · tap to enlarge
Step 1/6 Your weekly ranked brief: which agents need attention, and why.
Agents run the work. People own the outcome. Morse is the brief in between.
Built for teams where agents do real work in production and a person still answers for it.
- Agents in production, doing work your customers depend on.
- One person who defines success and confirms it.
- A weekly brief neither of them wrote.
The gap
Spend, traces, and evals each know a third of the story.
Today
Your AI bill is climbing. Are your agents getting better?
You built agents that qualify leads, summarize documents, route support tickets. They run. But are they getting cheaper, better, or quietly worse?
Model consoles show spend. Traces show executions. Eval results show sampled behavior. Deciding which production agent needs attention takes a read across those signals.
With Morse
Performance brief first. Traces on demand.
- One ranked list, not three tabs. Outcomes, spend, and sampled quality are read together to say which agent to look at first.
- Success is what you define. Rates are judged on outcomes you've labeled — a clean trace doesn't count as a win.
- Coverage stays visible. See how many outcomes are labeled and where a verdict is still forming.
- Separate lanes, no fused score. Each signal keeps its own coverage, so you can see what moved and why it ranked.
See the ranked brief and the evidence behind each decision. Why Morse ↓
Why Morse
Traces show the detail. Morse tells you where to look.
Start with which agent needs attention, then open its traces to verify the evidence. Here is how Morse helps with the questions behind that decision.
Your task: Decide which agent to inspect first
One ranked brief for your agents, with the evidence behind each line
See the sample brief →Your task: Judge whether there is enough evidence for a verdict
Coverage beside each verdict; the verdict is withheld when labeled outcomes are too few
See a withheld row →Your task: Find which part of the context window is growing
SDK-segmented context sources show what is growing, with best-effort attribution to the likely tool result
Docs ↗Your task: Check whether infrastructure evidence reached the trace
DB and HTTP spans and logs joined into the agent trace when your propagation carries them — and a verdict on why they're missing when it doesn't
Docs ↗Your task: Confirm that a run delivered the intended outcome
Success is the outcome you define and confirm; cost per success uses only spend on those successful runs
See the sample brief →
Cost per confirmed successful outcome
Spend on confirmed successful runs divided by those successes, with coverage shown. Failed and unknown outcomes stay separate.
Docs ↗A verdict that refuses
Neutral while a baseline forms, withheld when evidence is too thin, and “Needs review” when an investigation cannot form a confident hypothesis.
Docs ↗Also built in: failures to test cases in one click, regression comparisons with real statistics, a first-pass investigation on every alert, context-window profiling, composite AI + infra alerts, business-metric SLOs, memory on/off comparison, tool-cost accounting, a copilot and a read-only MCP endpoint. All features →
Private beta · invite-only · launching Q4 2026
Connect Morse
Three steps from first trace to first brief.
Cost and traces from your first instrumented run. Ranked verdicts once you've mapped success and sufficient labeled telemetry has formed a baseline.
- 1
Instrument
Add the SDK — Python or TypeScript — or point an OpenTelemetry exporter at Morse. Typed agent, LLM, tool, HTTP, and database spans start flowing; telemetry batches asynchronously and never blocks the request.
pip install morse-aiimport morse_ai # One line — reads MORSE_API_KEY from your environment morse_ai.init() # Cost, quality, and traces appear as your agent runsInvites arrive by email during private beta. Generate your API key during onboarding. No credit card, now or at launch.
- 2
Map success
Tell Morse what a successful run is for each agent. Outcomes can be labeled from your code, confirmed in the UI, or both. This is the step the brief is built on.
- booking-agent
- Booking confirmed
- data-extractor
- Extraction passed validation
- support-triage
- Ticket in the right queue
with morse_ai.run("support-triage"): ticket = route(request) morse_ai.set_outcome( success=ticket.routed_ok, outcome="routed", )TypeScript:
morse.setOutcome(). Unlabeled runs stay unknown — never counted as failures. Until enough runs are labeled, the brief shows coverage instead of a success rate. - 3
Read your first brief
Start with the ranked list. While labeled telemetry builds a baseline, verdicts stay neutral or withheld. Open a trace to check the evidence; compare weekly briefs once there is enough history to judge whether a change helped.
- data-extractor45.2% · -8.1 pts
- code-reviewer72.4% · +0.0 pts
- triage-agent79.4% · -11.9 pts
Ask from your editor over MCP — read-only, org-scoped.
Pricing at launch — Free: $0 · 5 agents · about 12,000 agent runs a month · 30-day retention · no credit card. Plans from $29/month.
Full pricing →Private beta
Join the waitlist
Your name and work email are all it takes. We'll tell you the day it opens.
We're working with a small number of design partners. If you run agents in production and want a founder-reviewed performance brief, say so when you join the waitlist.
The founder reviews and delivers your performance brief within 48 hours after you map a success signal and supply sufficient telemetry.
Request a founder-reviewed brief