AI-agent observability and evals · Verdict-first · OTLP-native
Know which agents are getting better — and which are just getting expensive.
A ranked performance brief for your agents — outcomes, cost, and quality kept separate, evidence one click away. Every week, in your dashboard, from the moment you've said what success means.
Private beta · invite-only · launching Q4 2026
Cost and traces from your first instrumented run. A ranked brief once you've told Morse what success means.
Demo org · illustrative data · tap to enlarge
Step 1/6 Your weekly ranked brief: which agents need attention, and why.
Agents run the work. People own the outcome. Morse is the brief in between.
Built for teams where agents do real work in production and a person still answers for it.
- Agents in production, doing work your customers depend on.
- One person who defines success and confirms it.
- A weekly brief neither of them wrote.
The gap
Spend, traces, and evals each know a third of the story.
Today
Your AI bill is climbing. Are your agents getting better?
You built agents that qualify leads, summarize documents, route support tickets. They run. But are they getting cheaper, better, or quietly worse?
Model consoles show spend. Traces show executions. Eval results show sampled behavior. None, on its own, ranks which production agent needs your attention now.
With Morse
Performance brief first. Traces on demand.
- One ranked list, not three tabs. Outcomes, spend, and sampled quality are read together to say which agent to look at first.
- Success is what you define. Rates are judged on outcomes you've labeled — a clean trace doesn't count as a win.
- Thin evidence is called out, not papered over. When there aren't enough labeled outcomes, the brief withholds the verdict instead of guessing.
- Separate lanes, no fused score. Each signal keeps its own coverage, so you can see what moved and why it ranked.
A verdict is a ranked performance brief — not a blended cost × eval metric. Morse keeps each evidence lane visible so you can judge what moved and what still needs review. Why Morse ↓
Why Morse
Trace-first tools show you everything. Morse tells you where to look.
Trace-first tools are built to record everything and answer instantly. The ranking, the doubt, and the anatomy of the prompt are left to you. Morse was built the other way round.
Trace-first tools: Per-trace detail; “which agent first?” is still your call
One ranked brief across every agent, with the evidence behind each line
See the sample brief →Trace-first tools: A number even when the data can't carry it
A verdict that refuses: no fabricated red, no $0 where cost can't be confirmed, “inconclusive” below the sample size
See a withheld row →Trace-first tools: The prompt logged as one blob
The context window segmented at the SDK — which part is growing, and which tool call caused it
Docs ↗Trace-first tools: An empty infra tab, no explanation
DB and HTTP spans and logs joined into the agent trace when your propagation carries them — and a verdict on why they're missing when it doesn't
Docs ↗Trace-first tools: A clean trace counted as a win
Success is the outcome you define and confirm; cost is per confirmed success
See the sample brief →
Weekly ranked brief
Which agents need attention first, why, and what to inspect — withheld where the evidence can't carry it.
Docs ↗Cost per confirmed successful outcome
Spend divided by successes you confirmed — never by guesses — with its coverage beside it.
Docs ↗A verdict that refuses
A neutral “baseline forming” instead of a fabricated red; nothing instead of $0; “inconclusive” below the sample size; “Needs review” when an investigation's evidence is thin.
Docs ↗Also built in: failures to test cases in one click, regression comparisons with real statistics, a first-pass investigation on every alert, context-window profiling, composite AI + infra alerts, business-metric SLOs, memory on/off comparison, tool-cost accounting, a copilot and a read-only MCP endpoint. All features →
Private beta · invite-only · launching Q4 2026
Connect Morse
Three steps from first trace to first brief.
Traces and cost from the first instrumented run. The brief once you've said what success means.
- 1
Instrument
Add the SDK — Python or TypeScript — or point an OpenTelemetry exporter at Morse. Typed agent, LLM, tool, HTTP, and database spans start flowing; telemetry batches asynchronously and never blocks the request.
pip install morse-aiimport morse_ai # One line — reads MORSE_API_KEY from your environment morse_ai.init() # Cost, quality, and traces appear as your agent runsInvites arrive by email during private beta; your API key is under Settings → API Keys. No credit card, now or at launch.
- 2
Map success
Tell Morse what a successful run is for each agent — a confirmed booking, an extraction that passed validation, a ticket routed to the right queue. Outcomes can be labeled from your code, confirmed in the UI, or both. This is the step the brief is built on.
- 3
Read your first brief
Start with the ranked list. Open a trace when you want to check the evidence. Next week's brief tells you whether the change helped.
- data-extractor45.2% · -8.1 pts
- code-reviewer72.4% · +0.0 pts
- triage-agent79.4% · -11.9 pts
Ask from your editor over MCP — read-only, org-scoped.
Pricing at launch — Free: $0 · 5 agents · about 12,000 agent runs a month · 30-day retention · no credit card. Plans from $29/month.
Full pricing →Private beta
Join the waitlist
Your name and work email are all it takes. We'll tell you the day it opens.
We're working with a small number of design partners. If you run agents in production and want a founder-reviewed performance brief, say so when you join the waitlist.
Request a founder-reviewed brief